{"id":1138,"date":"2026-08-27T05:28:52","date_gmt":"2026-08-27T05:28:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hay-balers.com\/?p=1138"},"modified":"2026-08-27T05:30:28","modified_gmt":"2026-08-27T05:30:28","slug":"ryegrass-hay-rake","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hay-balers.com\/ta\/application\/ryegrass-hay-rake\/","title":{"rendered":"Ryegrass Hay Raking: Italian vs Perennial in High-Yield Fields"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; max-width: 100%; line-height: 1.78; color: #2c2c2c;\">\n<h2 style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #235434; font-size: 1.75em; margin-top: 0; border-left: 5px solid #f2c043; padding-left: 14px;\">Hay Raking for Ryegrass: Italian vs Perennial Varieties in High-Yield Conditions<\/h2>\n<p style=\"font-size: 1.05em; background: #f7f7f7; border-left: 4px solid #235434; padding: 14px 18px; margin-bottom: 24px;\">Ryegrass hay raking presents an engineering challenge that is the inverse of the alfalfa problem: the issue is not leaf fragility but crop mat density and tine penetration resistance. Perennial ryegrass at first cut in a high-yield stand produces a flat, interlocked crop mat with fresh weights of 10-18 t\/ha \u2014 among the densest single-species forage crops processed by commercial hay rakes. Italian ryegrass compounds this with even higher biomass yield and a coarser stem structure. The key performance parameters for ryegrass raking are tine penetration force at the mat surface, windrow density control for high-capacity balers, and the hay vs silage decision that determines whether the crop needs a single raking pass or a conditioning and merging sequence.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #235434; font-size: 1.55em; border-left: 5px solid #f2c043; padding-left: 14px;\">Italian vs Perennial Ryegrass: Agronomic and Raking Parameter Comparison<\/h2>\n<div style=\"width: 100%; overflow-x: auto; margin: 20px 0;\">\n<table style=\"width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 0.91em; min-width: 640px;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background-color: #235434; color: #ffffff;\">\n<th style=\"padding: 11px 13px; text-align: left; border: 1px solid #1a4028; min-width: 180px;\">Parameter<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding: 11px 13px; text-align: left; border: 1px solid #1a4028;\">Italian Ryegrass<br \/>\n(Lolium multiflorum)<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding: 11px 13px; text-align: left; border: 1px solid #1a4028;\">Perennial Ryegrass<br \/>\n(Lolium perenne)<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"background-color: #f9f9f9;\">\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd; font-weight: bold;\">Yield range (1st cut fresh weight)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">12-22 t\/ha (high-fertility irrigated)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">8-16 t\/ha<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd; font-weight: bold;\">Stem diameter (basal)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">3-6 mm (coarser, more rigid)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">2-4 mm (finer tillering)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"background-color: #f9f9f9;\">\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd; font-weight: bold;\">Cut height at optimal harvest<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">60-100 cm (heading stage)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">30-60 cm (vegetative to early head)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd; font-weight: bold;\">Optimal rake moisture window (hay)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">40-55% (wide \u2014 stems hold structure)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">38-52%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"background-color: #f9f9f9;\">\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd; font-weight: bold;\">Rake moisture window (silage pre-wilt)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">55-70% (single rake pass then ensile)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">55-65%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd; font-weight: bold;\">Recommended ground pressure (hay)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">30-42 kg\/wheel (heavy mat penetration)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">25-36 kg\/wheel<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"background-color: #f9f9f9;\">\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd; font-weight: bold;\">Max forward speed (hay quality)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">10-13 km\/h<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">10-13 km\/h<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd; font-weight: bold;\">Primary tine wear mechanism<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">Abrasive mat contact \u2014 coarse stem base<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">Dense tillering \u2014 multiple contact events per revolution<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"background-color: #f9f9f9;\">\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd; font-weight: bold;\">Side delivery rake suitability<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">High \u2014 rotor speed handles dense mat effectively<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">High \u2014 uniform tillering suits fixed rotor arc<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd; font-weight: bold;\">Tine gauge minimum recommendation<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">8 mm \u2014 high abrasion + impact loading<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">7-8 mm<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h2 style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #235434; font-size: 1.55em; border-left: 5px solid #f2c043; padding-left: 14px;\">Ryegrass Mat Density and Tine Penetration Engineering<\/h2>\n<h3 style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #235434; font-size: 1.25em; margin-top: 20px;\">Why Dense Ryegrass Mats Require Higher Ground Pressure Than Other Forage Crops<\/h3>\n<p>Dense perennial ryegrass first-cut material forms a mat with a structural characteristic that resists tine penetration from the top: the dense tillering habit creates a surface layer of leaf sheaths and stem bases that interlock horizontally. At ground contact, the tine tip must first penetrate this interlocked surface layer before it can engage with and lift the material below. In a moderate crop mat (8-10 t\/ha fresh weight), tines at 20-25 kg ground pressure can penetrate the surface layer and lift material cleanly. In a high-density stand (14-18 t\/ha fresh weight), the same tine at 20-25 kg ground pressure will compress the mat surface without penetrating it \u2014 producing a &#8220;skimming&#8221; effect where the tine tip rides along the mat top surface rather than entering and lifting it.<\/p>\n<p>The engineering consequence is that ryegrass raking at medium or low ground pressure settings \u2014 appropriate for alfalfa or clover \u2014 consistently leaves 15-25% of the crop material in the residue mat. This residual is not recoverable without a second pass, and a second pass on already-dried ryegrass at low moisture compounds the abrasive mat contact on the tines, accelerating wear at a rate disproportionate to the additional yield recovered.<\/p>\n<p>The correct approach for high-yield ryegrass is a single pass at 30-42 kg ground pressure, which provides sufficient tine penetration force to fully engage the mat in one pass. At this pressure level in dense ryegrass, drawbar pull on a 9-wheel finger wheel rake can reach 5.0-6.5 kN \u2014 at the upper limit of the drawbar capacity for tractors below 65 HP. For ryegrass operations at first-cut peak yield, minimum tractor HP for a 9-wheel rake configuration is effectively 75 HP engine class rather than the 55 HP minimum that applies to the same machine in lower-density alfalfa operations.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #235434; font-size: 1.55em; border-left: 5px solid #f2c043; padding-left: 14px;\">High-Yield Ryegrass Windrow Density and Baler Throughput Matrix<\/h2>\n<p>Ryegrass hay baling presents a baler throughput challenge that is distinct from alfalfa or clover baling: the high-density, structurally cohesive windrow from a peak-yield ryegrass stand produces high bale density at the pickup, which is desirable for transport efficiency, but also generates peak torque demand on the baler flywheel that can trigger PTO overload events. The windrow density delivered by the hay rake directly determines the baler loading profile \u2014 a wider, lower-density windrow produces a lower peak torque event at each pickup revolution; a narrow, dense windrow produces a higher peak torque event.<\/p>\n<div style=\"width: 100%; overflow-x: auto; margin: 20px 0;\">\n<table style=\"width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 0.91em; min-width: 660px;\">\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"background-color: #235434; color: #ffffff;\">\n<th style=\"padding: 11px 13px; text-align: left; border: 1px solid #1a4028; min-width: 130px;\">Yield Level (fresh t\/ha)<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding: 11px 13px; text-align: left; border: 1px solid #1a4028;\">Recommended Windrow Width<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding: 11px 13px; text-align: left; border: 1px solid #1a4028;\">Estimated Windrow Mass (kg\/m length)<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding: 11px 13px; text-align: left; border: 1px solid #1a4028;\">Baler Pickup Speed Recommendation<\/th>\n<th style=\"padding: 11px 13px; text-align: left; border: 1px solid #1a4028;\">Peak PTO Torque Risk<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"background-color: #f9f9f9;\">\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd; font-weight: bold;\">6-9 t\/ha<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">1.4-1.8 m<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">8-15 kg\/m (at 35% MC)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">Standard \u2014 no adjustment needed<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd; color: #235434; font-weight: bold;\">Low<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd; font-weight: bold;\">9-13 t\/ha<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">1.6-2.0 m<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">15-24 kg\/m<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">Reduce baler forward speed 10-15% vs rated<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd; color: #a05c00; font-weight: bold;\">Moderate<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"background-color: #f9f9f9;\">\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd; font-weight: bold;\">13-18 t\/ha<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">1.8-2.2 m (spread wide)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">24-35 kg\/m<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">Reduce baler speed 20-30%; verify flywheel mass adequate for torque spike<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd; color: #c0392b; font-weight: bold;\">High \u2014 consider merging 2 windrows only at lower yield zones<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd; font-weight: bold;\">Above 18 t\/ha<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">Split each swath into 2 windrows<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">18-25 kg\/m (per split windrow)<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd;\">Two baler passes at standard speed<\/td>\n<td style=\"padding: 10px 13px; border: 1px solid #ddd; color: #235434; font-weight: bold;\">Low (per windrow) \u2014 total throughput maintained<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<h2 style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #235434; font-size: 1.55em; border-left: 5px solid #f2c043; padding-left: 14px;\">Silage Pre-Wilt Raking vs Hay Raking: Different Engineering Requirements<\/h2>\n<p>Ryegrass is widely used for silage production as well as hay, and the pre-wilt raking operation for silage differs from hay raking in engineering requirements. For silage, the crop is raked at 55-70% moisture \u2014 well above the hay raking window \u2014 to consolidate the cut swath into a windrow that can be picked up efficiently by a forage harvester. At this moisture level, ryegrass stems retain full elasticity and the tines encounter maximum crop resistance from the cohesive, wet mat.<\/p>\n<p>For silage pre-wilt raking, the priority is throughput speed rather than leaf retention. The crop at 55-70% moisture has sufficient petiole tensile strength that moderate leaf loss is agronomically acceptable \u2014 the ensiling process preserves nutritional value differently from the drying process in hay making, and the silage fermenting environment is less sensitive to mechanical leaf loss than a hay quality grading system. Ground pressure for silage pre-wilt can therefore be set at the high end (35-45 kg per wheel) and forward speed maintained at 12-14 km\/h, prioritizing throughput over the leaf-protective settings required for hay.<\/p>\n<p>The practical consequence for farms producing both hay and silage from the same ryegrass stand is that the hay rake must be recalibrated between silage and hay raking operations \u2014 the high-pressure, high-speed silage settings are inappropriate for late-cut hay operations at lower moisture. A written per-mode calibration record prevents the common error of running a silage-configured hay rake on a hay crop and producing excessive leaf loss.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #235434; font-size: 1.55em; border-left: 5px solid #f2c043; padding-left: 14px;\">Side Delivery Rake for High-Volume Ryegrass Operations<\/h2>\n<p>For commercial-scale ryegrass operations requiring merging of two swaths into a single high-density windrow for large square baler operations, the side delivery rake architecture has specific advantages over the finger wheel configuration. At high yields (above 12 t\/ha fresh weight), a side delivery rake running at 540 RPM PTO maintains rotor tip speed independent of forward speed \u2014 the operator can slow to 8-9 km\/h in a particularly dense zone without the tine contact speed dropping proportionally as it would on a ground-driven finger wheel rake. This decoupling of rotor speed from forward speed is the primary operational advantage of PTO-driven rakes in dense, variable-density ryegrass stands.<\/p>\n<p>At 12.0 m working width, the <a style=\"color: #235434; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: underline;\" href=\"https:\/\/hay-balers.com\/ta\/product\/9lh-12-side-delivery-rake\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">9LH-12 side delivery rake<\/a> processes a full 12 m swath at 540 RPM PTO input rated for 75-110 HP tractors, delivering a side-placed windrow suitable for large square baler pickup widths up to 2.1 m. For high-yield Italian ryegrass operations requiring the widest practical working width and the throughput rate to process peak-yield crops within a 2-3 day weather window, the 12 m side delivery configuration reduces the number of field passes required by approximately 35% compared to a 9.0 m finger wheel rake operating across the same field area.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #235434; font-size: 1.55em; border-left: 5px solid #f2c043; padding-left: 14px;\">Tine Wear and Replacement Intervals for Ryegrass Operations<\/h2>\n<p>Ryegrass raking produces higher tine wear rates than most other forage crops. The dense tiller base structure creates a high density of abrasive contact events per wheel revolution \u2014 each tine contacts multiple stem bases and leaf sheaths per arc transit rather than the single contact zone typical in more open-structured alfalfa stands. At 30-42 kg ground pressure in high-yield ryegrass, the cumulative abrasive wear on tine tips is 40-60% higher per operating hour than in equivalent-pressure alfalfa raking.<\/p>\n<p>For ryegrass-dominant operations, replace tines on a 180-hour interval for soft soil conditions and 120-hour interval for fields with any stone content or compacted surface soil. The 8 mm tine specification \u2014 strongly recommended for ryegrass operations \u2014 extends tine life by approximately 50-70% compared to 7 mm tines under the same abrasive loading conditions, which reduces the per-hectare tine cost despite the higher initial material cost per set.<\/p>\n<p>Inspect tine tips after each operational day in ryegrass \u2014 the abrasive wear produces a flat, blunt tip profile rather than the sharp-break failure typical of fatigue in stone-contact conditions. A tine that has lost more than 8 mm from the original tip profile has reduced penetration efficiency in the dense mat surface and should be replaced, even if it is structurally intact. Blunt tines require higher ground pressure to achieve equivalent mat penetration, which increases the fatigue loading on the remaining tine length and accelerates failure progression.<\/p>\n<div style=\"background-color: #f4f9f6; border: 2px solid #235434; border-radius: 4px; padding: 24px 28px; margin-top: 28px;\">\n<p style=\"margin-top: 0; font-size: 1.06em; font-weight: bold; color: #235434;\">Request Ryegrass Hay Rake Specifications for High-Yield Operations<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 10px;\">Canada hay-balers Co. Ltd. configures hay rake specifications for high-yield ryegrass operations including 8 mm tine upgrades, high-pressure spring systems, and large working width options for commercial throughput targets. Send your yield level, seasonal area, tractor HP, and hay vs silage mix to:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-bottom: 0;\"><a style=\"color: #235434; font-weight: bold; font-size: 1.1em; text-decoration: none;\" href=\"mailto:sales@hay-balers.com\">sales@hay-balers.com<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2 style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #235434; font-size: 1.55em; border-left: 5px solid #f2c043; padding-left: 14px;\">Wheel Float Performance in Dense Ryegrass: Why Independent Arm Suspension Matters<\/h2>\n<h3 style=\"font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; color: #235434; font-size: 1.25em; margin-top: 20px;\">Ground Pressure Consistency Across Uneven Ryegrass Fields<\/h3>\n<p>High-yield perennial ryegrass fields \u2014 particularly those under intensive management with multiple nitrogen applications \u2014 frequently develop surface irregularities from tractor wheel tracking, irrigation channel crossings, and mole drain subsidence. These field surface variations produce elevation changes of 60-150 mm within a single wheel-arm width, which is at or above the float capacity of fixed-geometry hay rake designs.<\/p>\n<p>A finger wheel rake with independent wheel arm float handles these surface variations without transmitting the elevation change to adjacent wheels. Each wheel arm rises and falls 80-120 mm independently \u2014 the 11th wheel over a drain subsidence point drops 90 mm without changing the ground contact pressure on wheels 10 and 12 on either side. In a dense ryegrass mat, this independent float behavior maintains consistent tine penetration depth across the full machine width even on topographically variable fields, which is critical because ground pressure variation of more than 8-10 kg between adjacent wheel positions produces visible windrow width variation and unraked strips in high-density ryegrass.<\/p>\n<p>Fixed-geometry or boom-follow rake designs that cannot float independently between adjacent wheel positions transmit surface elevation changes across multiple wheel positions simultaneously, producing a wave-pattern tine contact variation across the field width. In a moderate-density crop at 6-8 t\/ha fresh weight, this variation is tolerable \u2014 the windrow has sufficient material to cover minor tine penetration depth variation. In a high-density ryegrass stand at 14-18 t\/ha, the same variation produces alternating over-raked and under-raked strips that become visible in the baler feed pattern as density surges and gaps. Independent float is therefore not a luxury specification for ryegrass raking \u2014 it is a performance requirement in high-yield field conditions.<\/p>\n<p>The drawbar pull variation caused by surface undulation in high-yield ryegrass also affects forward speed consistency in tractor-mounted rake configurations. On a 20-degree slope section with 90 mm of surface drop over 4 m horizontal distance, the drawbar pull on a 9-wheel rake increases by approximately 0.8-1.2 kN above the flat-field baseline as the outer wheels descend into the depression. For tractors operating near their drawbar capacity limit for this machine-crop combination, this transient load increase can momentarily stall forward progress \u2014 producing a windrow irregularity at the depression location that appears as a bunched deposit in the windrow. Tractor HP margin of 10-15% above the flat-field drawbar requirement is the engineering buffer that prevents this effect in variable topography ryegrass fields.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Hay Raking for Ryegrass: Italian vs Perennial Varieties in High-Yield Conditions Ryegrass hay raking presents an engineering challenge that is the inverse of the alfalfa problem: the issue is not leaf fragility but crop mat density and tine penetration resistance. Perennial ryegrass at first cut in a high-yield stand produces a flat, interlocked crop mat [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[159],"tags":[166,165,164],"class_list":["post-1138","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-hay-rake-article","tag-italian-ryegrass-hay","tag-raking-ryegrass","tag-ryegrass-hay-rake"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hay-balers.com\/ta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1138","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hay-balers.com\/ta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hay-balers.com\/ta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hay-balers.com\/ta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hay-balers.com\/ta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1138"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/hay-balers.com\/ta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1138\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1141,"href":"https:\/\/hay-balers.com\/ta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1138\/revisions\/1141"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hay-balers.com\/ta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1138"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hay-balers.com\/ta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1138"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hay-balers.com\/ta\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1138"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}